Review



deep rna-seq  (Illumina Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Illumina Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Illumina Inc deep rna-seq
    Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/deep+rna+seq/pm38001496-203-21-20
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deep rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Evidence for widespread existence of functional novel and non-canonical human transcripts
    Article Snippet: In fact, 51 or 38.9% of the 131 InSETes could be detected with the coverage of over 0.5 based on Illumina deep RNA-seq (Fig. f).

    Article Title: Evidence for widespread existence of functional novel and non-canonical human transcripts.
    Article Snippet: In fact, 51 or 38.9% of the 131 InSETes could be detected with the coverage of over 0.5 based on Illumina deep RNA-seq (Fig. 4f).



    Similar Products

    deep rna seq  (Azenta)
    86
    Azenta deep rna seq
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/rna+seq/pmc13036076-377-0-12
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deep rna seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)  (Biotechnology Information)
    90
    Biotechnology Information transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Transcriptome Deep Sequencing (Rna Seq), supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/transcriptome+deep+sequencing++rna+seq+/pm39171839-66-16-42
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    deep rna-seq  (Azenta)
    90
    Azenta deep rna-seq
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/deep+rna+seq/pmc11321822-526-25-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deep rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)  (Novogene)
    90
    Novogene transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq)
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Transcriptome Deep Sequencing (Rna Seq), supplied by Novogene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/transcriptome+profiling+by+rna+seq+and+data+analysis/10__1016_slash_j__postharvbio__2023__112719-77-0-7
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    transcriptome deep sequencing (rna-seq) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    deep rna-seq  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc deep rna-seq
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Deep Rna Seq, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/deep+rna+seq/pm38001496-203-21-20
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deep rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing  (Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd)
    90
    Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Rna Seq Library Preparation And Deep Sequencing, supplied by Annoroad Gene Technology Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/mrna+seq+library+preparation/pm37301892-300-4-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rna-seq library preparation and deep sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rna-seq deep sequencing  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc rna-seq deep sequencing
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Rna Seq Deep Sequencing, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/rna+seq+libraries/pmc10295823-130-10-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rna-seq deep sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rna-seq deep-sequencing  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc rna-seq deep-sequencing
    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq <t>and</t> <t>RNA-seq</t> libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Rna Seq Deep Sequencing, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deep+rna-seq/rna+seq+libraries/pmc03429483-95-15-14
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rna-seq deep-sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq and RNA-seq libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: CRAGE-RB-PI-seq reveals transcriptional dynamics of plant-associated bacteria during root colonization

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69903-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A A pooled library of groups I–III was grown under five different conditions. PI-seq and RNA-seq libraries were created for each condition ( n = 2 biological replicates). B – E Analysis of PI-seq data for the cells grown in 20 mM glucose. DNA barcode counts showed a narrow distribution and high coverage of the designed library ( B ) with high reproducibility ( C ). RNA barcode counts normalized to DNA barcode counts showed a large variation in promoter activity. Groups II and III promoters (intergenic distance ≥31 bp) were more active than group I promoters (intergenic distance ≤ 30 bp). log₂ promoter activity is shown in arbitrary units (A.U.) ( D ). The biological replicates for groups II and III showed high reproducibility of promoter activity, while group I promoter activity was weaker ( E ). Pearson’s r correlation values for each group are shown. F In silico prediction of operon structure identified 1149 operons and 2094 single genes. Of these 3243 genes, 2880 promoters were cloned into the library. G Comparison of promoter activity under two conditions. PI-seq data under 20 mM glucose (x-axis; blue points) and 20 mM citrate (y-axis; red points) highlights upregulated promoters. Differentially activated promoters were selected based on fold changes (FCs) (log 2 FC > 2.5) after filtering out low-activity promoters (log 2 promoter activity <2). H Comparison of gene expression under 20 mM glucose and 20 mM citrate conditions using RNA-seq data. Genes driven by the promoters identified by PI-seq in ( G ) are highlighted. I Comparison of log 2 fold changes between PI-seq (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) shows strong quantitative agreement, particularly for promoters with large fold changes (log 2 FC > 2.5). The fold changes were calculated by analyzing expression under 20 mM citrate condition divided by that under 20 mM glucose condition for each method. Pearson’s r correlation values are provided (all genes: dashed gray line, genes with log 2 FC > 2.5: solid black line). J Illustrations of the most upregulated promoters and their associated downstream genes. 140 bp promoter regions are highlighted in pink. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: Deep RNA-seq on root samples (Supplementary Fig. ) were also processed by Azenta Life Sciences, incorporating dual rRNA depletion for both plant and bacterial RNA.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Activity Assay, In Silico, Clone Assay, Comparison, Gene Expression, Expressing